Oct
14
the way i see it, the trade with the Nets brought in a solid player to Milwaukee. with Redd there, the Bucks can revamp their market. face it, Milwaukee does not have as much support in Wisconsin as the Packers or even the Brewers. Do you think it would be best for the Bucks to keep Redd for marketing purposes and focus on the draft in bringing in solid defenders? Joe Alexander will help, but won’t be enough alone. what is your opinion on this?
Comments
8 Responses to “Do The Bucks Need To Trade Micheal Redd?”
They have a pretty good core — with the addition of Richard Jefferson and Joe Alexander today- they have some good pieces in the front court.
i think they can shop Redd but they don’t need to trade him. i mean teams like Cleveland covet a guy like Redd- so at least entertain some offers.
Nickster
Tough one, He would be great to keep but they could get some good new young talent if they trade him. If they did trade him for 2 young good players they could work on keeping the team together and growing together, Bogut and Yi are still very young and have alot of improving to do and if you put another 2 young guys in there it would look very good for 5 years down the track.
Redd is going to stay with the Bucks he’s a shooter and will probably be there for a long time till he is very close to retirement and then they might trade him. Also he will always have that streaky shot but will be unable to play “D” he will be like Steve Kerr can shoot but not play “D”
He is not a #1 scorer that can lead a team to a championship.
If they can package him and Mo WIilliams or Charlie Villanueva or whatnot, i think they getting a top scorer will make them a contender, at least in the East.
Redd is not going anywhere. The Bucks like their team with him and Jefferson together.
They’re going to keep Redd it doesn’t make sense to let him go anyways.
keep him
i think he will stay in Milwaukee until he retires
i never knew michael redd was good until this season